[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs or xemacs?
From: |
Jochen Küpper |
Subject: |
Re: emacs or xemacs? |
Date: |
12 Sep 2002 10:23:34 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Emacs/Gnus |
On 12 Sep 2002 10:29:43 +0200 Klaus Berndl wrote:
Klaus> On 11 Sep 2002, Jochen Küpper wrote:
>> Actually Emacs is (3 packages) in the standard Cygwin install nowadays...
Klaus> Oooops... AFAIK there is no official release port of GNU Emacs
Klaus> to Cygwin... Is this not true anymore?? Is there now an
Klaus> official port of GNU Emacs 21.X to cygwin (downloadable
Klaus> binaries build with cygwin and installable by the cygwin
Klaus> setup)?
Well, what's "offocial"? :)) Emacs is in the standard cygwin package
hirarchy nowadays (but yes, only recently added).
It needs some patching and apparently the company who's employee fixed
it for cygwin is somewhat slow to sign the copyright assignments to
FSF... (Which is not so strange if it's their first time:)
Greetings,
Jochen
--
Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de
Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité GnuPG key: 44BCCD8E
Sex, drugs and rock-n-roll
- Re: No HTML mails in Gnus (was: emacs or xemacs?), (continued)
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Adam, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Sacha Chua, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Zhongtao Zhu, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?,
Jochen Küpper <=
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, maierh, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, D . Goel, 2002/09/12
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Rodney Sparapani, 2002/09/11
Re: emacs or xemacs?, A. L. Meyers, 2002/09/14