[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs or xemacs?
From: |
A. L. Meyers |
Subject: |
Re: emacs or xemacs? |
Date: |
14 Sep 2002 10:33:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Although it may not be perfect, the xemacs package system works
reasonably well and is certainly better than no package system at all,
alas still the case with emacs AFAIK.
My personal hope is that the developers of both emacsen with soon get
over the unicode hump and with unicode as the base get all the other
encodings to work transparently in the background. A stupid, lazy end
user's dream. :-)
Lucien
--
If you receive this by error, please delete it and inform the sender.
PGP Key fingerprint=F1C0 D9AE 1B18 1405 4DFA B4CC 6DC7 FF78 C76E FB15
To Big Brother Echelon from "spook":
Ortega cracking anthrax North Korea World Trade Center colonel NORAD FBI
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, (continued)
- RE: emacs or xemacs?, Aurelio, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Sacha Chua, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/11
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Klaus Berndl, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Zhongtao Zhu, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, Jochen Küpper, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, maierh, 2002/09/12
- Re: emacs or xemacs?, D . Goel, 2002/09/12
Re: emacs or xemacs?, Rodney Sparapani, 2002/09/11
Re: emacs or xemacs?,
A. L. Meyers <=