[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PAM Authentication Patch
|
From: |
Chad Walstrom |
|
Subject: |
Re: PAM Authentication Patch |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:58:49 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
Chad Walstrom wrote:
> We should make it abundantly clear in the documentation that use of
> PAM authentication should be thoroughly protected. If such measures
> cannot be taken, don't enable PAM.
Additionally, we can't always assume that because something uses PAM,
it'll authentication against system accounts. There are dbm modules,
ldap modules, etc. that can be used for account management.
--
Chad Walstrom <address@hidden> http://www.wookimus.net/
assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- CVS, Documentation, TODO Lists, New Maintainer, and Stuff, Chad C. Walstrom, 2004/06/10
- Re: CVS, Documentation, TODO Lists, New Maintainer, and Stuff, Chad C. Walstrom, 2004/06/10
- Re: CVS, Documentation, TODO Lists, New Maintainer, and Stuff, Mel Hatzis, 2004/06/11
- Re: CVS, Documentation, TODO Lists, New Maintainer, and Stuff, Andrew Gray, 2004/06/12
- Re: CVS, Documentation, TODO Lists, New Maintainer, and Stuff, Yngve Svendsen, 2004/06/10
- Re: CVS, Documentation, TODO Lists, New Maintainer, and Stuff, Pankaj K Garg, 2004/06/14
- Re: PAM Authentication Patch, Chad Walstrom, 2004/06/21