[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that re
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes) |
Date: |
Mon, 03 May 2021 13:00:22 -0400 |
Hi Leo,
Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:
> Am Montag, den 03.05.2021, 05:00 -0400 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
>> Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:
>>
>> > Am Samstag, den 01.05.2021, 23:13 -0400 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
>> > > I don't think I fumbled on the facts at all. It's true that I
>> > > didn't yet have _all_ of the relevant facts, but as far as I
>> > > know, every fact that I presented is true.
>> > >
>> > > If you disagree, can you please provide a counterexample?
>> >
>> > In your very first message you made it seems as though Raghav
>> > single-handedly authored and pushed the changes in question and
>> > called into question their reliability as a committer. The former
>> > was based on "facts", that turned out half-true – Raghav did push
>> > that commit, but they did so thinking that Léo did proper review,
>> > which they did not –
>>
>> Here, once again, you've failed to point out any of my *actual* words
>> to back up your (bogus) claim that I "fumbled on the
>> facts". Instead, you speak of how I "made it seem". You put more
>> words into my mouth.
> If you want to read your actual words, they were
>> Behold, Raghav's "cosmetic changes" to our 'cairo' package
I don't know how the genitive case is used in German, but in English, it
can mean a great many things, from possession (Mark's bicycle) to mere
association (Mark's community of friends) and many other things. It
certainly does *not* imply single-handed authorship as you suggest
above.
I'll grant that you are correct in your speculation that at the time I
wrote the words above, in my *mind* I more-or-less assumed that Raghav
had authored the commit. After all, Raghav digitally signed and pushed
the commit, whose metadata indicated that he was the sole author.
However, I never *wrote* anything that implied he was the sole author.
Therefore, I still maintain that in my actual communications, I didn't
"fumble on the facts" *at all*.
I'm going to _try_ to refrain from responding again, because in order
for this exchange to be finite, *one* of us must eventually let the
other one have the final word.
Regards,
Mark
--
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>.
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2021/05/01
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Prikler, 2021/05/01
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/05/01
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/05/01
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Prikler, 2021/05/01
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/05/01
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Prikler, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/05/03
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Prikler, 2021/05/03
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes),
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), 宋文武, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Famulari, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), 宋文武, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Prikler, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Prikler, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Prikler, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Ludovic Courtès, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/05/02