[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that re
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes) |
Date: |
Sun, 02 May 2021 17:02:49 -0400 |
Hi Leo,
Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:
> Am Sonntag, den 02.05.2021, 15:29 -0400 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
>>
>> Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> writes:
>>
>> > Let us assume for the sake of argument I were to introduce a bug
>> > into Guix. There are a number of ways this can happen, but let's
>> > focus on the important distinction here, which is me purposefully
>> > introducing that bug vs. it happening due to oversight.
>> >
>> > Let us imagine the following four scenarios:
>> > 1. You assume I'm acting in bad faith and I indeed am.
>> > 2. You assume I'm acting in bad faith and I am not.
>> > 3. You assume I'm acting in good faith and I am not.
>> > 4. You assume I'm acting in good faith and I am.
>>
>> This is a false dilemma <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma>,
>> because you've missed a very important case, namely:
>>
>> 5. You assume *nothing*.
> I think you're nitpicking here.
I don't think so.
> clearly I either have evil intentions or I don't – there's no middle
> ground.
Yes, I agree with this.
> Likewise, there's no middle ground on assuming evil
> intentions, you either assume they exist or you don't.
That's true also, but this is a different dichotomy than the one you
presented above. In the sentence above, the dichotomy is between:
(1) You assume bad faith
(2) You do not assume bad faith
In your list of scenarios above, there's a (false) dichotomy between:
(1) You assume bad faith
(2) You assume good faith
It's a false dichotomy because neither of these is the logical negation
of the other. They cannot both be true, but they _can_ both be false.
In other words, I think that you have conflated "not assuming bad faith"
with "assuming good faith". Do you see the difference?
This is not mere nitpicking. It's a very important distinction.
It's analogous to being forced to choose between "faith in god" and
"atheism", without allowing for the possibility of "agnosticism".
Does that make sense?
>> This is, in fact, the current scenario. I'm not making any
>> assumptions.
>> That is truly the state of my mind on this question, and I think it's
>> the only rational position to take.
> Which one is the rational position now? Not assuming evil intentions
> or assuming them?
I think the only rational position to take here is to not make
assumptions.
Regards,
Mark
--
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>.
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), (continued)
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), 宋文武, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Famulari, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), 宋文武, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Prikler, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Prikler, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes),
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Leo Prikler, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Ludovic Courtès, 2021/05/02
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), Mark H Weaver, 2021/05/02
- Message not available
- Re: Criticisms of my "tone" (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes), 宋文武, 2021/05/02