[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merge wip-haskell?
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: merge wip-haskell? |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Aug 2020 17:37:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3 |
Timothy Sample <samplet@ngyro.com> writes:
> I just pushed “wip-haskell-updates-2” which integrates my work from
> <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/39309>. I left the original branch intact
> to make it easy to compare.
I rebased this on top of “master” and pushed it as “wip-haskell”. I
updated my changes to pandoc and pandoc-citeproc so that the statically
linked variants are now separate packages.
The evaluations on ci.guix.gnu.org failed due to a few minor bugs in the
extra-directories code (missing “match” case for inputs with declared
outputs, and a missing list wrapper in one package). I fixed up that
commit and now wait for ci.guix.gnu.org to start building things:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/wip-haskell
--
Ricardo
- merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/06
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, John Soo, 2020/08/06
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Timothy Sample, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Timothy Sample, 2020/08/09
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/12
- Re: merge wip-haskell?,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/15
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Timothy Sample, 2020/08/17
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/08/24
Re: merge wip-haskell?, Jakub Kądziołka, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, John Soo, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Jakub Kądziołka, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, John Soo, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/08/24
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/24