Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?)

[Noah Lavine]

And this fixes an error that came because Unicode 00A0 (no-break
space) is supposed to be considered whitespace in ECMAScript.

Noah

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Noah Lavine <address@hidden> wrote:
> This patch fixes a lot of the "unexpected token: rbrace" errors that
> had been messing up the Sputnik test results. The issue was that Guile
> didn't allow functions with empty bodies.
>
> Noah
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Noah Lavine <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The attached patch should add support for ECMAScript unicode literals.
>>
>> Noah
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Kan-Ru Chen <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Noah Lavine <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> If you mean give guile a '.js' file have it interpret that with
>>>> ecmascript, then I think it's not possible right now, although I
>>>> suspect that such a feature could be added easily.
>>>
>>> Right, I've cooked a little script to interpret .js files directly.
>>>
>>> I ran the sputniktests[1] from google using the attached guile-es-parse
>>> script, which only tests the parser.
>>>
>>>  python tools/sputnik.py --full-summary --command ./guile-es-parse|tee log
>>>
>>> The result is impressive (full log attached):
>>>
>>>  === Summary ===
>>>   - Ran 5246 tests
>>>   - Passed 4410 tests (84.1%)
>>>   - Failed 836 tests (15.9%)
>>>
>>> Where the failed tests have
>>>
>>>   - 245 unicode errors (unicode literal is not supported)
>>>   - 393 rbrace errors  (see below)
>>>   - 39 Math.LN2 errors (see below)
>>>   - 159 remain to sort out
>>>
>>> The rbrace errors are from
>>>
>>>   function test() {}
>>>   // Syntax error: unexpected token :  in form rbrace
>>>
>>>   function foo() { this.bar = function() { return 0; } };
>>>   // Syntax error: unexpected token :  in form rbrace
>>>
>>> I also tried to compile the parsed tests, but halted because too many
>>> errors like
>>>
>>>   Object.prototype.toString = function () {return "something";};
>>>   // No applicable method for #<<generic> pput (6)> in call (pput
>>>   // #<unbound> toString #<procedure 1e1c438 ()>)
>>>
>>> I thought the tests won't run correctly without this.
>>>
>>> [1]: https://code.google.com/p/sputniktests/
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Kanru
>>> --
>>> A badly written book is only a blunder. A bad translation of a good
>>> book is a crime.
>>>                -- Gilbert Highet
>>>
>>
>

0001-Ecmascript-Syntax.patch
Description: Binary data