[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ECMAScript support broken?
From: |
Kan-Ru Chen |
Subject: |
Re: ECMAScript support broken? |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:42:07 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Noah Lavine <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello again,
>
> Second problem solved as well. The attached patch fixes both issues.
>
> Anything else you notice being wrong with ecmascript? (I mean our
> implementation of it, of course ...)
Hi,
I got the same answer (previous mail), I should check mail before send it ;-)
I plan to run some ecmascript test suite as well as the library I want
to use in my project. Do you know how to run guile as a ecmascript
interpreter from command line?
Cheers,
Kanru
--
A badly written book is only a blunder. A bad translation of a good
book is a crime.
-- Gilbert Highet
- ECMAScript support broken?, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/02
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/02
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/03
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?,
Kan-Ru Chen <=
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/03
- Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/04
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/17
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/26
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/26