[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ECMAScript support broken?
From: |
Noah Lavine |
Subject: |
Re: ECMAScript support broken? |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Jan 2011 22:19:45 -0500 |
Hi all,
I looked at this. For the first error, I think the bug is in (language
ecmascript compile-tree-il), where the file around line 369 says:
((object . ,args)
(@impl new-object
(map (lambda (x)
(pmatch x
((,prop ,val)
(-> (apply (-> (primitive 'cons))
(-> (const prop))
(comp val e))))
(else
(error "bad prop-val pair" x))))
args)))
This produces (@impl new-object ()) if args is '(), but it should just
be (@impl new-object). I tried changing that bit to
((object . ,args)
(if (null? args)
(@impl new-object)
(@impl new-object
(map (lambda (x)
(pmatch x
((,prop ,val)
(-> (apply (-> (primitive 'cons))
(-> (const prop))
(comp val e))))
(else
(error "bad prop-val pair" x))))
args))))
and it now works. (It's terribly hackish - does anyone have a better
solution?) I don't have time to look at the rest right now, but I'll
try to soon unless someone else figures it out (please :-) ).
Noah
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Kan-Ru Chen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently want to start a small project that uses guile as the
> JavaScript interpreter, but the current git HEAD has errors regard
> object definition.
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> scheme@(guile-user)> ,L ecmascript
> Happy hacking with ECMAScript! To switch back, type `,L scheme'.
> ecmascript@(guile-user)> var test = {};
> While compiling expression:
> ERROR: unrecognized tree-il ()
> ecmascript@(guile-user)> var test = { bar: 1 };
> While compiling expression:
> ERROR: unrecognized tree-il ((apply (primitive cons) (const bar) (const 1)))
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
>
> Happy new year!
> Kanru
> --
> A badly written book is only a blunder. A bad translation of a good
> book is a crime.
> -- Gilbert Highet
>
>
- ECMAScript support broken?, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/02
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?,
Noah Lavine <=
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/03
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/03
- Re: ECMAScript support broken?, Noah Lavine, 2011/01/03
- Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Kan-Ru Chen, 2011/01/04
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Noah Lavine, 2011/01/11
- Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?), Ludovic Courtès, 2011/01/17