Re: JACAL, scm

[Thien-Thi Nguyen]

   From: Rob Browning <address@hidden>
   Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 18:07:34 -0500

   I only reason I included that is because though I don't really know
   exactly what elisp might require, I was extrapolating from what I
   know about scheme.

well if you take it on faith that scheme is the most general language,
then optimization as a class of integration issue moves back out below
the horizon.  this view also suggests an implementation change style
that would be additive only, not necessarily replacing or interfering w/
whatever works pre-change.

this might be obvious to everyone, i'm just thinking aloud...

thi