[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JACAL, scm
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: JACAL, scm |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Oct 2001 21:51:51 -0700 (PDT) |
If I'm not wildly mistaken, it seems to me that there's not really
much of a design or even a strategy _at_all_ for the somewhat lofty
idea of having multiple languages compile down to Scheme, and then run
from guile.
That was never a goal. Mulitple syntaxes and specialized
sublanguages were a goal. Elisp is special.
Ctax was a good examle, before it was gratuitously thrown away.
-t
- Re: JACAL, scm, (continued)
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/10/03
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/10/03
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/10/03
- Re: JACAL, scm, Evan Prodromou, 2001/10/03
- Re: JACAL, scm,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/04
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/04
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/04
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/04
Re: JACAL, scm, Marius Vollmer, 2001/10/03
Re: JACAL, scm, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/04
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/04
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/04
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/05
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/07