[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible typo in doc/Makefile.am
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: Possible typo in doc/Makefile.am |
Date: |
13 Jun 2001 22:12:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.102 |
Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
> >>>>> "Neil" == Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Neil> Are there any other names similar to `stamp-vti' and
> Neil> `stamp-vti1' in the generated Makefile.in? (These file names
> Neil> aren't documented at all in the manual.)
>
> You aren't supposed to use them.
> What is it that you're trying to do?
The rules have been added to cause "varion.texi" to be generated even
when guile-core is configured without `--enable-maintainer-mode'. I
don't remember why that was thought to be a good thing. Maybe because
people got their daily dose from anonymous CVS, but a freshly checked
out guile-core wouldn't build when not configured with
`--enable-maintainer-mode'. It would build with that kluge. Or
something like that.
If we have problems because of these rules, we should remove them and
tell people to configure CVS checkouts with
`--enable-maintainer-mode'. We should also provide snapshots made
with `make distcheck'. Don't know for sure if the ones on
www.glug.org are build that way yet.
[ Thien-Thi, did you get the mails that I sent to <address@hidden>? ]
New auto tools, Neil Jerram, 2001/06/09
- Re: New auto tools, Rob Browning, 2001/06/09
- Re: New auto tools, Neil Jerram, 2001/06/10
- Re: New auto tools, Dale P. Smith, 2001/06/10
- Re: New auto tools, Rob Browning, 2001/06/10
- Re: New auto tools, Rob Browning, 2001/06/10
Re: Possible typo in doc/Makefile.am, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/11