Re: [Gdbheads] Re: Feb's patch resolution rate

[Stan Shebs]

Andrew Cagney wrote:

> > > Hmm, I should have also counted who reviewed Daniels patches as I now
> > >
> > > > suspect the results would be similar.
> > > >
> > > > If anything it should be Elena and you [david] maintaining the 
> > > > symbol table.
>
> Jim, lets stick to this question.  Would the pair:
>
>     Elena
>     David
>
> make for a better symbol table leads than:
>
>     JimB
>     Elena
>
> The symbol table is a critical piece of infrastructure and as such 
> needs a steady hand, and a long term commitment by developers.  Both 
> through overhaul, and through a disciplined and diligent review of 
> patches. What the area does not need is random tugs in differing 
> directions based on the wim of "maintainer of the day".

What I hear you saying here is that you don't think Jim is qualified
to be a global maintainer of GDB, is that right? Is this something
the SC should be taking up?

Stan