Re: [Enigma-devel] Status

[Ingo van Lil]

On 28 Aug 2004, Daniel Heck wrote:

> I did.  It's nice, but for my purposes, arch is even nicer.  Makes me
> feel more efficient, but that may subjective.  Objectively, arch's
> support for branching and merging is vastly superior.  It's so much
> easier to move experimental code in a separate branch or to maintain a
> stable and a development branch at the same time than with either CVS or
> Subversion, it's simply awesome.

I had a look at the arch tutorial today. Looks like a pretty good
solution, but it seems to handle binary files terribly inefficient: For
each change of a binary file both the original version and the new one
are stored. I don't know if CVS is any better, though.

        Cheers,
            Ingo