Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `csl' citation processor

[Bruce D'Arcus]

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:18 AM Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com> wrote:

> I was expecting (not to say I should have necessarily) in this case:
>
> [cite:@doe p23]
>
> ... that either "p23" is recognized as a locator, or as a suffix
> string for the citation reference.

To be clear, Nicolas, your change to the regex this today, however,
does recognize that as a locator, so this specific example is a
non-issue ATM.

I am still curious about the behavior though.

Bruce