Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `csl' citation processor

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

"Bruce D'Arcus" <bdarcus@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 4:01 AM Denis Maier <denismaier@mailbox.org> wrote:

>> I think a plain "p" in front of a number is not recognized as a locator
>> prefix.
>> Nicolas's post mentions "page", "p.", "pp." as valid locator terms for
>> page. So in your case this here seems to apply: "The part of the suffix
>> before the locator is appended to reference's prefix."
>
> I missed the significance of that last part.
>
> What's the use case there Nicolas?

This was ported from Citeproc Org library. I don't think there's a use
case, but that information should not be dropped silently, so it's a way
to do "something" about it.

> Aside from that, a bit more testing this morning, with plain, latex
> and html is looking good. I got exected output using default and the
> chicago-note-bibliography-16th-edition.csl style.

Great!

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou