[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation process
From: |
Bruce D'Arcus |
Subject: |
Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor |
Date: |
Thu, 20 May 2021 11:14:33 -0400 |
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:29 AM Denis Maier <denismaier@mailbox.org> wrote:
>
> Am 20.05.2021 um 16:11 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
...
> > 1. I wasn't sure Nicolas was aware of this config option, nor how one
> > would configure it currently (but it seems necessary in general)
>
> No, it's only necessary to configure this if you don't want the defaults.
>
> In authoryear styles you have autocite=inline by default
> In authortitle styles you have autocite=inline by default
> In verbose styles you have autocite=footnote by default
>
> So, if you use an authoryear/authortitle style, but want
> autocite=footnote you'll have to declare this as a package option.
Oh good!
> > 2. If you set default to autocite=inline, which is to say the
> > non-bare/plain style, the issue you note goes away?
> >
>
> Not sure. Autocite* => parencite*, but there's still no cite/bare* then.
Just to clarify:
There's no autocite command variant that produces the bare output?
But there are other more output-specific commands that do?
>From your followup to this:
> Another thought here:
> Yes, it could be [cite/parens/bare:...] but also [cite/note/bare:...].
Why is that necessary?
If I interpreted the above correctly, is not the limitation in
biblatex autocite?
E.g. Nicolas could map "cite/bare" to whatever paren or note biblatex
variant, depending on the citation style?
> @Bruce: We don't have bare citation in CSL currently, right? Perhaps we
> should add this to add some portability...
No, just as we don't have (yet) in-text, but processors have implemented it.
That's why I recommend on that table that citeproc-org/el supports it;
it's easy enough to add.
Bruce
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, (continued)
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor,
Bruce D'Arcus <=
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Thomas S. Dye, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Thomas S. Dye, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/21
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Denis Maier, 2021/05/20
- Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/05/21