[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thoughts on the standardization of Org
From: |
Russell Adams |
Subject: |
Re: Thoughts on the standardization of Org |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Nov 2020 16:23:33 +0100 |
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 02:56:58PM +0000, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> (as an aside, Emacs as an LSP could be interesting, especially if
> network based)
#+BEGIN_RANT
LSP is a standard from Microsoft:
https://github.com/Microsoft/language-server-protocol/
It allows networked JSON and telemetry, as well as all the other
problems that come from trusting the remote server:
https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/specification-current/#telemetry_event
Either of these items would provide justification for me to exclude
LSP from any personal consideration, and for me to strongly recommend
against it's use in any capacity.
Microsoft and related technologies have no place in my Emacs. I don't
care to see Org made easy or functional in Visual Studio.
Why contribute to layers which allow an illegal monopoly more
market share? Why code for them for free?
#+END_RANT
On a milder tone, I think it's silly to send JSON packets every time I
type a key, even to a local service.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Russell Adams RLAdams@AdamsInfoServ.com
PGP Key ID: 0x1160DCB3 http://www.adamsinfoserv.com/
Fingerprint: 1723 D8CA 4280 1EC9 557F 66E8 1154 E018 1160 DCB3
- Re: Thoughts on the standardization of Org, (continued)
- Re: Thoughts on the standardization of Org, Asa Zeren, 2020/11/01
- Re: Thoughts on the standardization of Org, Ken Mankoff, 2020/11/01
- Re: Thoughts on the standardization of Org, Eric S Fraga, 2020/11/02
- Re: Thoughts on the standardization of Org, Tim Cross, 2020/11/02
- Re: Thoughts on the standardization of Org, Greg Minshall, 2020/11/02
Re: Thoughts on the standardization of Org, David Rogers, 2020/11/03