Re: [O] FW: [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options

[stardiviner]

Gustav Wikström <address@hidden> writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode-bounces+gustav=address@hidden> On
>> Behalf Of stardiviner
>> Sent: den 15 december 2019 15:26
>> To: Gustav Wikström <address@hidden>
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> Subject: Re: [O] FW: [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> I figured out why on my side inline image does not work.
>> 
>> When have link with description, the inline image does not work. When has
>> no link description, inline image works.
>> 
>> Here is an example:
>> 
>> #+begin_src org
>> # link work for inline image
>> [[attachment:screenshot.png]]
>> 
>> # inline image does not work
>> [[attachment:screenshot.png][description]]
>> #+end_src
>> 
>> I tested by EMC, found this is caused by some option. I will figure it
>> out. Thanks!
>
> FWIW, I see the same behavior as you do when I add descriptions. The same 
> seems to 
> apply for file-links. I haven't looked it up to see if that's intended 
> though. Just 
> wanted to share how it works for me, if you're scratching you're head over 
> this!
>
> Actually... Not wanting to push the "Send" button without looking into the 
> manual, I 
> found the following in the "Images" section:
>
>       "An image is a link to an image file(1) that does not have a 
> description part"
>
> See [[info:org#Images]]
>
> Regards
> Gustav

I read Org Info manual before, forgot most things, just put memory into
usual behavior now..... I will read Org Info manual again. :) glade you figure
out my wrong point, thanks.


-- 
[ stardiviner ]
       I try to make every word tell the meaning what I want to express.

       Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/
       IRC(freenode): stardiviner, Matrix: stardiviner
       GPG: F09F650D7D674819892591401B5DF1C95AE89AC3