emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] FW: [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options


From: stardiviner
Subject: Re: [O] FW: [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:52:32 +0800
User-agent: mu4e 1.3.2; emacs 27.0.50

Gustav Wikström <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi stardiviner,
>
> It is my belief that =[Ctrl-C Ctrl-l]= already is supported. You will only 
> get suggestions for attachments if there are any attachments on the outline 
> node you're in. Or in any of its parents if inheritance is configured.
>

For example, I press =[Ctrl-c Ctrl-a]= to attach a file. Then I press =[Ctrl-c
Ctrl-l]= (~org-insert-link~) to insert link which will show a list of 
completions
which are all link types prefix like ~attachment:~, and
=file:data/a2/..../attachFile.png=. I mean the second link. it is already in
completion list, but ~attchment:~ does not have this support.

> Regards Gustav
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode-bounces+gustav=address@hidden> on behalf 
> of stardiviner <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 6:21:30 AM
> To: address@hidden <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [O] FW: [RFC] Link-type for attachments, more attach options 
>  
>
> Hi Gustav,
>
> I suggest to add support for =[Ctrl-C Ctrl-l]= like ~file:~ link type. which 
> will
> auto in completion list. It will be convenient for user.


-- 
[ stardiviner ]
       I try to make every word tell the meaning what I want to express.

       Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/
       IRC(freenode): stardiviner, Matrix: stardiviner
       GPG: F09F650D7D674819892591401B5DF1C95AE89AC3
      



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]