[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:08:34 +0100 |
Hello,
Alan Tyree <address@hidden> writes:
> Suggested wording:
>
> In 8.1:
>
>
> timestamp can appear anywhere in the headline or body of an Org tree
> entr UNLESS is is preceded by a keyword in which case it must be properly
> positioned or it will be ignored: see 8.3 for details.
This is wrong. Only the keyword is ignored, not the timestamp. This is
why DEADLINE and SCHEDULED location is unrelated to section 8.1.
> A timestamp may be preceded by special keywords to facilitate planning.
> WARNING: both the timestamp and the keyword are ignored if not positioned
> immediately following the headline. No space or other text is allowed.
I think "immediately following the headline" is unambiguous. No need to
specify "no space or other text is allowed".
I modified section 8.3 accordingly.
WDYT?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Marco Wahl, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Philip Hudson, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Samuel Wales, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/11/09
Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Yasushi SHOJI, 2016/11/21