[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry
From: |
Yasushi SHOJI |
Subject: |
Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:10:52 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 |
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 18:37:00 +0900,
Alan Tyree wrote:
>
> Is this the way it should be? The first DEADLINE: shows up both as a
> warning and on the due date in the agenda, but the second one does
> not. It only works for me if the DEADLINE: is the first line after the
> heading. Version 9, emacs 24
>
> *** test 1
> DEADLINE: <2016-11-19 Sat>
>
> *** test 2
>
> DEADLINE: <2016-11-19 Sat>
at release_9.0.1-47-gb062593 with the following org file, org-agenda
shows the closed entry. Is this also related?
Yes, org-lint complains about the 4th "scheduled" line saying:
"Misplaced planning info line", but isn't deadline planning info line?
is any of planning info line not allowed in the body?
---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
* DONE org
DEADLINE: [2016-01-07 Thu 17:39]
SCHEDULED: <2015-09-29 Tue .+1w>
---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
; /tmp/a.el
(add-to-list 'load-path "~/src/org-mode/lisp")
(setq org-agenda-files '("/tmp/a.org"))
---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
$ emacs -Q -l /tmp/a.el -f 'org-agenda'
--
yashi
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, (continued)
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Samuel Wales, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/11/09
Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry,
Yasushi SHOJI <=