[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:36:24 +0100 |
Hello,
Alan L Tyree <address@hidden> writes:
> On 10/11/16 05:51, Philip Hudson wrote:
> Also, if this really is the case, then the manual needs to be
> modified. Under 8.1, it says
>
> " A timestamp can appear anywhere in the headline or body of an Org tree
> entry."
Section 8.1 is about regular time-stamps, which are not necessarily tied
to DEADLINE and SCHEDULED keyword. Therefore, the sentence above is
true.
> and under 8.3:
>
> "A timestamp may be preceded by special keywords to facilitate planning:"
>
> I can't see anywhere that requires the DEADLINE: keyword to be flush
> against a heading.
This is in 8.3.1, first footnote.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Marco Wahl, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Philip Hudson, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Samuel Wales, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/11/09
Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Yasushi SHOJI, 2016/11/21