[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry
From: |
Sebastien Vauban |
Subject: |
Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:08:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (cygwin) |
Yasushi SHOJI <address@hidden> writes:
> Alan Tyree wrote:
>>
>> Is this the way it should be? The first DEADLINE: shows up both as a
>> warning and on the due date in the agenda, but the second one does
>> not. It only works for me if the DEADLINE: is the first line after the
>> heading. Version 9, emacs 24
>>
>> *** test 1
>> DEADLINE: <2016-11-19 Sat>
>>
>> *** test 2
>>
>> DEADLINE: <2016-11-19 Sat>
>
> at release_9.0.1-47-gb062593 with the following org file, org-agenda
> shows the closed entry. Is this also related?
>
> Yes, org-lint complains about the 4th "scheduled" line saying:
> "Misplaced planning info line", but isn't deadline planning info line?
> is any of planning info line not allowed in the body?
>
> ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
> * DONE org
> DEADLINE: [2016-01-07 Thu 17:39]
>
> SCHEDULED: <2015-09-29 Tue .+1w>
>
> ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
A shoot in the dark: replace the [] by <>.
[] for DEADLINE does not make much sense...
--
Sebastien Vauban
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, (continued)
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Samuel Wales, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/09
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Alan Tyree, 2016/11/10
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Nicolas Goaziou, 2016/11/09
Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry, Yasushi SHOJI, 2016/11/21
- Re: [O] DEADLINE: position in entry,
Sebastien Vauban <=