[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:36:48 +0100 |
On 17.3.2013, at 08:01, "Sebastien Vauban" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
>
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> On 17.3.2013, at 02:19, Thomas S. Dye <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Achim,
>>>
>>> Achim Gratz <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>
>>>> I'm playing around with the current version, here is what I have so far:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The arguments to #+attr_texinfo need to lose the double quotes
>>>>
>>>> Index entries in description lists must be separated from their entry by
>>>> at least one blank line like in the example below, otherwise the second
>>>> such entry gets indented in the exported .texi file and that somehow
>>>> confuses texinfo for some of them.
>>>>
>>>> - {{{kbd(v d)}}} or short {{{kbd(d)}}}, ~org-agenda-day-view~ ::
>>>>
>>>> {{{kindex(v d)}}}
>>>> {{{kindex(d)}}}
>>>> {{{vindex(org-agenda-span)}}}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With these hanges I get the manual exported correctly to all formats.
>>>
>>> Done. Thanks.
>>>
>>> I brought the manual up-to-date and used @@info:@@ for the problem macro
>>> characters, so it should be completely converted to Org now.
>>
>>
>> I tried the file on github, and export to texinfo fails with the attached
>> backtrace (exports to other backends as well).
>>
>> I love this idea, so I really want to try. Any ideas what might be wrong on
>> my side?
>>
>> - Carsten
>>
>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Unknown marker at 281861")
>
> Could you try M-x goto-char 281861?
You mean in orgmanual.org?
It jumos to "see" in
---------------------------------------------------------
- %:keyword ::
Specific information for certain link types, see below.
----------------------------------------------------------
>
> I have such a msg in old files where I had my own @ markes.
>
> Best regards,
> Seb
>
> --
> Sebastien Vauban
>
>
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, (continued)
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/16
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Thomas S. Dye, 2013/03/16
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual,
Carsten Dominik <=
Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/21
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/22
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/22
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/22
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/22
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/23
- Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/23