Re: [O] [RFC] Org version of the Org manual

[Achim Gratz]

Am 22.03.2013 19:17, schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> > You might want to use the (function (lambda ...)) form.
>
> Why? (function (lambda ...)) is equivalent to (lambda ...). In fact,
> `lambda' uses `function' as a subroutine.

http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Anonymous-Functions.html

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1852844/emacs-lisp-difference-between-function-lambda-and-lambda

With Emacs 24.3 and eager macro expoansion the need to do this has 
diminished, but for the benefit of older Emacsen we should probably 
continue the practise.

> That's why I also suggest to drop the (mapcar 'org-trim ...) wrapper.
> There's no reason to remove blanks if the user inserted them in the
> first place.

Oh, OK - I did not realise that.

> Since that's not costly to achieve, there no real reason not to support
> it.

I'll trust you on the "not costly" part, I can't do any experiment right 
now.

> So, any objection (or further comment) for that change?

Please go ahead.


Regards,
--
Achim.

(on the road :-)