Re: Not protecting Lisp objects from GC

[tomas]

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 06:55:55AM +0100, Gerd Möllmann wrote:
> tomas@tuxteam.de writes:
> 
> >> Tomas was basically saying my thought of delegating GC stuff to another
> >> maintainer was ridiculous.
> >
> > No: your interpretation is wrong. What I was saying is that your
> > behaviour of taking your ball and walk away if your don't get your
> > way is not constructive.
> 
> I'm not taking my ball and leaving. I made GNU its own ball, as a copy
> of my ball, and others later helped make both balls prettier. GNU still
> has its ball. And I said right from the start that I won't maintain
> GNU's ball, ever. So much to having to be "constructive".
> 
> Shall GNU do with its ball what it wants. I've shared what I have, the
> rest is in the end not my beer, but I can speak up when things go down,
> and they do.
> 
> BTW, just to get everything in one reply, I won't discuss style issues
> with you. That's not _your_ beer.

We seem to agree. Let's leave things at that.

Cheers
-- 
t

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature