Re: Not protecting Lisp objects from GC

[tomas]

On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 08:57:12PM +0100, Gerd Möllmann wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>>> >> Stubbornness is not a 
> >> virtue. If you feel insecure in GC things, how
> >> >> about delegating that part to other co-maintainers, who I guess are also
> >> >> at the steering wheel?
> >> >
> >> > Sorry, Gerd. For me, this just jumps the shark.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers
> >> 
> >> You can't have followed the discussions and not get the impression that
> >> Eli isn't exactly an expert in GC things. And that is relevant, not
> >> absurd.
> >
> > Once again: my objections were not because of the effects on the GC
> > code.
> 
> This is not about a specific patch or something.
> 
> Tomas was basically saying my thought of delegating GC stuff to another
> maintainer was ridiculous.

No: your interpretation is wrong. What I was saying is that your
behaviour of taking your ball and walk away if your don't get your
way is not constructive.

Cheers
-- 
t

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature