Re: Not protecting Lisp objects from GC

[Gerd Möllmann]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
>> Cc: tomas@tuxteam.de,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 20:57:12 +0100
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> >> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>>> >> Stubbornness is not a 
>> >> virtue. If you feel insecure in GC things, how
>> >> >> about delegating that part to other co-maintainers, who I guess are 
>> >> >> also
>> >> >> at the steering wheel?
>> >> >
>> >> > Sorry, Gerd. For me, this just jumps the shark.
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers
>> >> 
>> >> You can't have followed the discussions and not get the impression that
>> >> Eli isn't exactly an expert in GC things. And that is relevant, not
>> >> absurd.
>> >
>> > Once again: my objections were not because of the effects on the GC
>> > code.
>> 
>> This is not about a specific patch or something.
>> 
>> Tomas was basically saying my thought of delegating GC stuff to another
>> maintainer was ridiculous.
>
> I didn't respond to what Tomas was saying, I responded to what you
> were saying about my being non-expert on this and that.

And? Does it make my statement that you are not an expert on GC untrue?
And would that fact not be relevant for deciding to delegate or not?