Re: Not protecting Lisp objects from GC

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>
> Cc: tomas@tuxteam.de,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 20:57:12 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>>> >> Stubbornness is not a 
> >> virtue. If you feel insecure in GC things, how
> >> >> about delegating that part to other co-maintainers, who I guess are also
> >> >> at the steering wheel?
> >> >
> >> > Sorry, Gerd. For me, this just jumps the shark.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers
> >> 
> >> You can't have followed the discussions and not get the impression that
> >> Eli isn't exactly an expert in GC things. And that is relevant, not
> >> absurd.
> >
> > Once again: my objections were not because of the effects on the GC
> > code.
> 
> This is not about a specific patch or something.
> 
> Tomas was basically saying my thought of delegating GC stuff to another
> maintainer was ridiculous.

I didn't respond to what Tomas was saying, I responded to what you
were saying about my being non-expert on this and that.