[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous
From: |
Gerd Möllmann |
Subject: |
Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jan 2025 14:43:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> We also have a couple places where we currently call
>>>> `inhibit_garbage_collection`. Do we need to do anything about them?
>>>
>>> No, it's a nop with igc. One could compile it out, maybe, but I leave
>>> it to future generations to save these nanoseconds :-).
>>
>> I'd compile it out mainly for documentation purposes.
>> I'll send a patch.
>
> Patch attached.
LGTM
Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous, Pip Cet, 2025/01/12
Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/01/12