Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous

[Gerd Möllmann]

Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:

> Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> OTOH, having a GC that is merely incremental and generational is not too
>>> shabby, plus if Ravenbrook or someone else decides to lift the
>>> restriction, we would benefit from that also.
>>
>> IIRC, Helmut said he'll do it :-)
>
> Even better!

Cheers to Helmut! (But it was just meant as a joke :-))