[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jan 2025 11:20:39 +0000 |
Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> OTOH, having a GC that is merely incremental and generational is not too
>> shabby, plus if Ravenbrook or someone else decides to lift the
>> restriction, we would benefit from that also.
>
> IIRC, Helmut said he'll do it :-)
Even better!
Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous, Pip Cet, 2025/01/12
Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/01/12