[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous
|
From: |
Gerd Möllmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous |
|
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:12:02 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> OTOH, having a GC that is merely incremental and generational is not too
> shabby, plus if Ravenbrook or someone else decides to lift the
> restriction, we would benefit from that also.
IIRC, Helmut said he'll do it :-)
Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous, Pip Cet, 2025/01/12
Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous, Eli Zaretskii, 2025/01/12