|
| From: | Stefan Kangas |
| Subject: | Re: scratch/igc: Implications of MPS being asynchronous |
| Date: | Sun, 12 Jan 2025 13:07:05 +0000 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes: >> Do you have a better word to propose here than "asynchronous"? > > I don't think this aspect of MPS is very important to us. So I would > suggest simply dropping that part. Do you suggest dropping the words "synchronous" and "asynchronous", or not documenting this at all?
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |