Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps?

[Gregory Heytings]

> What you reported was more educated guesses than results.

No, these are results.

> Why don't you actually _measure_ some hopefully typical Emacs use, and 
> tell us exactly how you got these measurements.  Start off saying how 
> you configured your build, followed by calling emacs -Q, with all the 
> other detailed steps needed to duplicate your measurements.

This information is all upthread, but in case you missed it, I'll repeat 
it here.  I built Emacs with its standard configuration options (IOW I 
just typed "make" in a fresh clone of the repository), on an up-to-date 
and unloaded Debian bookworm machine.  To split the time of make check 
between compilation and execution, I used the attached patch (which I 
already sent upthread).

> > You may have seen that this optimization has no effect without 
> > --with-native-compilation.  This may explain that.
>
> The bootstrap time without native compilation is much shorter in any 
> case.

This is an unrelated question, but no, it is not.  With just "make" (IOW 
without --with-native-compilation) I do not see a significant difference 
between 10083e788f and 808917b3fc.

Add-a-target-to-byte-compile-all-tests-without-runni.patch
Description: Text Data