Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps?

[Gregory Heytings]

> > At least the test suite is not a micro-benchmark.  I exercises a large 
> > subset of Emacs features, and I don't see anything in these ~110K lines 
> > of Elisp that make them significantly different from other Elisp 
> > programs.  My conclusion is that Emacs is now, on average, about 10% 
> > slower.
>
> Your conclusion is premature.  While micro-benchmarks don't represent a 
> typical Emacs usage, neither are the tests in the test suite.  They are 
> run in batch mode, and the don't involve important Emacs subsystems, 
> such as the display engine.
>
> So the actual slowdown in "normal" usage could be quite different from 
> what the test suite measures.

I think you understood what I meant: bytecode execution in Emacs is now, 
on average, about 10% slower.  Are there other benchmarks (not 
micro-benchmarks) that could be used to reach what you would consider a 
mature conclusion?