[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching
From: |
Thuna |
Subject: |
Re: Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:46:32 +0300 |
> Thanks, but why do we need such an option, given that we have
> buffer-change history, and so the visible buffers are usually just a
> couple of keystrokes away, like M-n?
If a buffer is open in multiple windows and one of these windows is
momentarily switched off of to look at something else, it is unintuitive
for buffer switching to default to a non-visible buffer instead of the
previously open buffer. More often than not, a quick [C-x b RET] is,
and should be, sufficient for switching buffers. Forcing the user to
actively choose the buffer they want introduces unnecessary burden which
can be a significant source of distraction over time.
- Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching, Thuna, 2022/01/26
- Re: Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/26
- Re: Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching,
Thuna <=
- Re: Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2022/01/26
- Re: Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching, Juri Linkov, 2022/01/27
- Re: Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching, Thuna, 2022/01/29
- Re: Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/01/29
- Re: Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching, Thuna, 2022/01/29
- Re: Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching, Po Lu, 2022/01/29
- Re: Allow controlling the effect of visibility on buffer switching, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2022/01/29