[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?
|
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 16 May 2018 10:43:16 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Lars" == Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
>> Just in case I change the default setting and don't remember, which
>> setting do I have to check?
> `gnus-blocked-images'.
Ok I changed the variable to
Its value is ‘gnus-block-private-groups’
Still the math png are displayed. My setting is
(setq gnus-mime-display-multipart-alternative-as-mixed nil) ; most important
(setq gnus-mime-display-multipart-related-as-mixed nil)
(setq gnus-mime-display-multipart-as-mixed nil)
(setq mm-discouraged-alternatives '("text/html")) ;standard setting for quotes
in gmail
(setq mm-text-html-renderer 'shr)
So am I save with this setting?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/15
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/16