emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?


From: Uwe Brauer
Subject: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 10:44:52 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Hi

Currently there is a ongoing discussion on
gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.user
about the vulnerability of smime/pgp.
Which was published in 
https://efail.de/efail-attack-paper.pdf


I am using, besides gnupg,  s/mime in GNU emacs with gnus, using gpgsm
and epg.

Now in the documented listed above mutt is listed, which is text based,
as being vulnerable.


So I am wondering: am I save with the above setting, maybe I should
check my html settings in gnus?

Regards

Uwe Brauer 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]