[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?
|
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2018 21:26:46 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Lars" == Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
>> So I am wondering: am I save with the above setting, maybe I should
>> check my html settings in gnus?
> Gnus doesn't load external resources when reading mail (by default).
Just in case I change the default setting and don't remember, which
setting do I have to check?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/15
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/15
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?,
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/16
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/15