Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: dbus patch

[intrigeri]

Hello,

Kenneth Loafman wrote (06 Nov 2008 14:25:38 GMT) :
> I'm in favor of the dbus functionality as long as the primary goal
> of duplicity is not diminished, that of being a solid backup package
> that will run unattended via cron or similar. If it happens to
> obtain a user interface that does not in any way interfere with that
> goal, then we have a winner.

FWIW, I agree with this.

Let's keep what duplicity is good at, and give frontend developpers
what they need to make duplicity usable for less tech-savvy / desktop
desktop users.

Bye,
-- 
  intrigeri <address@hidden>