denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] One verse per page for projector presentation


From: Richard Shann
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] One verse per page for projector presentation
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:46:19 +0100

It is late at night here, so I will just answer very briefly (more
tomorrow)


On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 20:06 +0000, Kevin Wenz wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your answer!
> 
> 
> The verses should be laid out underneath the notes and the notes
> should be repeated for every verse/chorus.
> 
> 
> If my song has a chorus and 2 verses it should look like that:
> ---------------------------
> 
> -- first page --
> 
> Title of the song
> 
> Copy right
> ....
> 
> 
> -- second page --
> 
> contains: the text and the notes of the first verse (the verse's
> syllables should be placed under each corresponding note)
> 
> -- thirds page --
> contains: the text and the notes of the chorus (again the text is laid
> out under the notes)
> 
> -- fourth page --
> contains: the text and the notes of the second verse (again the text
> is laid out under the notes)
> 
> -- fifth page --
> contains: the text and the notes of the chorus (once again the text is
> laid out under the notes)
> ------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Okay i have to use the 'Score Layout'.
> 
> For now i have 2 movements (one for the verses and one for the
> chorus). How can i change the order of the specified verses and the
> chorus in the 'Score Layout'. The only things i am seeing are the
> 'score-wide settings' and the two movements (the thing i can do is
> changing the verses order inside a movement).
> 
> Is it possible to add more movements and reuse the notes?

Yes, that is one approach you can use, I'll do an example tomorrow.

>  Do i have the wrong approach? Or do i maybe have to work with
> lilypond commands?

I'm sure it won't involve editing actual LilyPond - you have all the
ingredients to hand.

Richard

> 
> 
> Greetings
> 
> - Kevin
> 
> 
> Richard Shann <address@hidden> schrieb am Mi., 16. Sep. 2015
> um 17:03 Uhr:
> 
>         On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 15:32 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
>         > so unless you can
>         > work editing that
>         sorry, that was garbled, omitting the quoted bit renders it
>         intelligible...
>         R
>         





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]