[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [certi-dev] Re: CERTI Java-binding ?;
From: |
Martin Spott |
Subject: |
Re: [certi-dev] Re: CERTI Java-binding ?; |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Jul 2008 19:27:55 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
tin/1.9.2-20070201 ("Dalaruan") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.25.8-amd64 (x86_64)) |
Eric,
"Eric Noulard" wrote:
> Currently in CERTI there is no "fully distributed" knowledge
> of the subsriber/publisher structure which would be necessary for
> the "peer-to-peer" communication you describe.
I think this is a misunderstanding. I just wanted to point out that the
demands of 'our' radar client are pretty low, it's nothing but a simple
listener. I'd say it doesn't make a difference wether the communication
is against the RTIG or peer-to-peer.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- CERTI Java-binding ?; Was: [certi-dev] certi performance comparison, Martin Spott, 2008/07/01
- Re: CERTI Java-binding ?; Was: [certi-dev] certi performance comparison, Eric Noulard, 2008/07/02
- RE: CERTI Java-binding ?; Was: [certi-dev] certi performance comparison, Gotthard,Petr, 2008/07/02
- [certi-dev] Re: CERTI Java-binding ?;, Martin Spott, 2008/07/02
- RE: [certi-dev] Re: CERTI Java-binding ?;, Gotthard,Petr, 2008/07/02
- Re: [certi-dev] Re: CERTI Java-binding ?;, Eric Noulard, 2008/07/02
- Re: [certi-dev] Re: CERTI Java-binding ?;,
Martin Spott <=
[certi-dev] Re: CERTI Java-binding ?;, Martin Spott, 2008/07/02