Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation

[Imran Ghory]

On 23 Jan 2001, at 15:44, Mike Warren wrote:

> "Imran Ghory" <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > An article which may be regarded as factually biased today, will
> > almost certainly be regarded as factually biased in 30 years time .
> 
> But will an article regarded as factual today be regarded as factual
> in 30 years?

I'm not saying that an article should be moderated to say "factual", 
rather "This article was voted on as being non-"factually biased", 
this should not be taken to mean that this article is necessarily 
true rather that the body voting on it could not see a bias in this 
article"

Imran Ghory