[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation
From: |
Imran Ghory |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 20:59:06 -0000 |
On 24 Jan 2001, at 20:17, Mike Warren wrote:
> "Imran Ghory" <address@hidden> writes:
> > On 23 Jan 2001, at 15:36, Mike Warren wrote:
>
> > > My point is that the actual article repository shouldn't have any
> > > classification information whatever; as is clear from these
> > > discussions, there are many different opinions on how to classify
> > > things and this suggests that there will be continual arguments if
> > > one classification is imposed on the content. No, the XML should
> > > not have a classification in it at all.
>
> > Even if the author wished to add classification data ? (i.e the
> > ability to say "this article may be biased by my personal beliefs")
>
> If an author wants to write something, then he should. I'm saying that
> classification meta-data shouldn't be put into the back-end database.
What if the auhtor wishes to include classification meta-data in his
article ?
Imran
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Mike Warren, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Imran Ghory, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Mike Warren, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Imran Ghory, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Mike Warren, 2001/01/24
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Rob Scott, 2001/01/21
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Tom Chance, 2001/01/24