Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation

[Mike Warren]

"Imran Ghory" <address@hidden> writes:

> I'm not saying that an article should be moderated to say "factual",
> rather "This article was voted on as being non-"factually biased",
> this should not be taken to mean that this article is necessarily
> true rather that the body voting on it could not see a bias in this
> article"

I agree that such a classification of articles would be useful.

I disagree that it should go into the actual article repository. None
of this type of meta-data should appear in the repository. Remember,
the goal is to produce a wide array of FDL-licensed content; is
classifying it now going to make sense later (i.e. 10, 20, 50 years
from now)? The answer, I think, is no and hence such classification
data shouldn't appear in the repository of articles.

-- 
address@hidden
<URL:http://www.mike-warren.com>
GPG: 0x579911BD :: 87F2 4D98 BDB0 0E90 EE2A  0CF9 1087 0884 5799 11BD