Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation

[Rob Scott]

yes i understand now.
that sounds like a great thing to add once weve got
everything going.


--- Imran Ghory <address@hidden> wrote: > On 21
Jan 2001, at 14:01, Rob Scott wrote:
> 
> > I dont thik there should be a 'voting' system
> which
> > relies on many people.   Any article should only
> have
> > to be accepted by one moderator, so that
> marginalised
> > views wont be pushed out by a lowest common
> > denominator voting system.   
> 
> I'm not suggesting voting to allow/disallow articles
> (except in the 
> case of abuse), I'm suggesting that the basic
> categorization be 
> done by voting(i.e if the article contains
> information which 
> somepeople may debate as factually incorrect).
> 
> If someone sees an article which they disagree with
> the worse they 
> can do is to vote to say that the article takes a
> position which may 
> be factually debatable. We can set the limit quite
> low, for instance 
> at 20%. We could say that if more then 20% of the
> reviewers think 
> this article is factually biased then it will be
> marked as such.
> 
> Imran
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnupedia mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnupedia


____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie