bibledit-general
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [be] Re: Compiling Bibledit on OS X


From: Doug Glidden
Subject: Re: [be] Re: Compiling Bibledit on OS X
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:31:27 -0500

My bad; I wasn't paying close enough attention to notice the subtle change in the discussion (from chmsee to dbus).  Sorry for confusing matters. :-)

Doug

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Teus Benschop <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Doug,

I probably was not complete in my description of this matter. The dbus
would be used on all three platforms, on Linux for communicating with
Xiphos and BibleTime, and on Windows for communications with BibleTime,
and with Xiphos if that is available for Windows, and on the Mac for
both Xiphos and BibleTime, although I am not sure if these run with
Macports - probably they do.

I think that the background to this is that there may be a difficulty
compiling the dbus sofware on Windows - am I correct, Dan? On the other
hand I seem to recall that dbus on Window now works, but this may not be
correct.

Teus.


On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 23:33 -0500, Doug Glidden wrote:
> Teus,
>
> I'm just an observer on this discussion, but if integration of
> BibleTime on Windows is the only reason for this being required,
> wouldn't it be possible to set up the switch such that the switch is
> disabled (i.e. dbus cannot be disabled) when the compilation
> environment is Windows?  It seems like that would satisfy everyone,
> since the only environment where the package seems to be unavailable
> is for Macintosh, which doesn't need it anyway.
>
> Doug Glidden
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Teus Benschop
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>         On the matter of optionally disabling the dbus, I can say the
>         following:
>         There has been a request for BibleTime for Windows to work
>         together with
>         Bibledit. If this is going to work, since BibleTime uses the
>         dbus for
>         communication, then the switch to disable dbus would cripple
>         Bibledit,
>         and people will ask questions as why this does not work. My
>         view is that
>         the dbus is now a necessary part of bibledit. Teus.
>
>         On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 07:40 -0800, Dan Dennison wrote:
>         > On Oct 28, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Teus Benschop wrote:
>         >
>         > > However, if anybody needs to disable this, then this
>         switch can be put
>         > > in. Right now the code is not sane since floating windows
>         are being
>         > > introduced. I'll put this switch in once the code base is
>         back to
>         > > normal
>         > > again.
>         >
>         > I also vote for a switch to disable dbus.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>
>
>
>
>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]