On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 23:33 -0500, Doug Glidden wrote:
> Teus,
>
> I'm just an observer on this discussion, but if integration of
> BibleTime on Windows is the only reason for this being required,
> wouldn't it be possible to set up the switch such that the switch is
> disabled (i.e. dbus cannot be disabled) when the compilation
> environment is Windows? It seems like that would satisfy everyone,
> since the only environment where the package seems to be unavailable
> is for Macintosh, which doesn't need it anyway.
>
> Doug Glidden
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Teus Benschop
> <
address@hidden> wrote:
> On the matter of optionally disabling the dbus, I can say the
> following:
> There has been a request for BibleTime for Windows to work
> together with
> Bibledit. If this is going to work, since BibleTime uses the
> dbus for
> communication, then the switch to disable dbus would cripple
> Bibledit,
> and people will ask questions as why this does not work. My
> view is that
> the dbus is now a necessary part of bibledit. Teus.
>
> On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 07:40 -0800, Dan Dennison wrote:
> > On Oct 28, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Teus Benschop wrote:
> >
> > > However, if anybody needs to disable this, then this
> switch can be put
> > > in. Right now the code is not sane since floating windows
> are being
> > > introduced. I'll put this switch in once the code base is
> back to
> > > normal
> > > again.
> >
> > I also vote for a switch to disable dbus.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>